I remain unconvinced by Kamala Harris. The Democratic vice-presidential nominee took to the stage on Thursday night as the final act of a four-day convention—an appearance hyped with the pomp and spectacle of a rock concert or a Hollywood awards show. But the fanfare seemed desperate, an attempt to inflate the standing of someone who, as yet, hasn’t earned it.

What unsettles me is that Harris was fast-tracked into the finals without facing the rigors of the primaries, without winning over her fellow candidates and, crucially, the voters. Who decided that she was the preferred candidate? On what grounds? Was it merit, or merely optics? The Democratic Convention in Chicago seemed to prioritize the latter.

The issue with Harris is that everyone feels the need to convince us of her greatness—a stark contrast to Barack Obama in 2008. Obama, despite lacking extensive experience at the time, commanded a presence and vision that resonated. With Harris, that commanding presence is sorely lacking.

Harris stepped into an arena filled with warm applause, but while she delivered her lines competently enough, she did not project the gravitas of a future President of the United States.

The issue with Harris is that everyone feels the need to convince us of her greatness—a stark contrast to Barack Obama in 2008.

Harris is doing what she can, but being a woman—indeed, a Black woman—does not suffice as a résumé to lead the free world. That uncomfortable reality never seemed to trouble Joe Biden, who, despite his age, brought with him decades of experience and a clear vision of leadership grounded in the political center.

Harris, on the other hand, failed to exhibit any discernible leadership qualities, not even when she reached the stage and struggled to command the room, unable to cut through the applause with any sense of authority.

Vice President Kamala Harris delivers remarks during a campaign rally, at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in Detroit, Michigan. ( Photro credit: Kit Karzen/Harris for President)

Harris lacks conviction, as though she herself doubts she can ascend to the presidency. She recites the words, certainly, but one feels they’re the result of rote memorization, not inner belief.

Kamala Harris has a compelling story as the daughter of an immigrant woman who came to the United States with a dream. Her ambition took her to the upper echelons of American power, but her nomination would have carried far more weight if she had earned it through the primaries, rather than simply stepping in as a replacement for a man who not only earned his vote but was also serving his first term and was pushed out just three months before Election Day.

The real challenge for Harris is to bridge societal gaps and demonstrate that her commitment to inclusivity extends beyond mere lip service.

Her stump speech, crafted by Biden’s speechwriter, professed a commitment to being a President for all. However, her preemptive dismissal of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals a troubling disregard for the inclusivity she claims to champion.  This inconsistency betrays her pledge to listen and engage with diverse perspectives, undermining her own promises before even taking office.

That’s the crux of the matter, isn’t it? In a fractured society, where divisions seem to grow daily, the question of whether political promises are genuine or merely strategic rhetoric becomes more pressing. The real challenge for Harris is to bridge societal gaps and demonstrate that her commitment to inclusivity extends beyond mere lip service.

I remain unconvinced by Kamala Harris. While she may not aggravate as some political candidates do, the perception that those around her are using her as a pawn for their own ambitions makes her candidacy a particularly difficult pill to swallow.

READ ALSO

Chronicles on Freedom: My Life in Voluntary Exile

“It is we who changed. Everything else remained the same,” the Croatian waiter at Monte’s Trattoria in New York City told me as he poured champagne into my crystal glass, barely able to hold back the emotional flood rising inside him. He was probably in his late 60s, with warm eyes behind thick black-rimmed glasses.…

Keep reading

Trump’s Day in Office: July 30, 2026

8:00 AM President Trump participates in Executive Time 10:30 AM President Trump greets the White House Internship Program 12:00 PM President Trump participates in a Policy Meeting 1:30 PM President Trump makes an Announcement on Freedom Haulers 3:00 PM President Trump participates in Signing Time 4:30 PM President Trump participates in a Policy Meeting

Keep reading

Ksenija Pavlovic is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of the Pavlovic Today, The Chief White House Correspondent. Pavlovic was a Teaching Fellow and Doctoral Fellow in the Political Science department at...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

  1. The Democrat Party
    Why has it become Three D Party?
    Dollars, Deceit, and Death!
    Nothing there for the hardworking
    American public.

  2. I agree with the article.
    I’m only voting for her because Trump is totally out of control and his mind.
    I am not at all sold on Kamala Harris.
    I don’t think she’s ready for prime time.
    I think Adam Schiff will regret his part in forcing President Biden out.
    What happens when she makes missteps will Democrats turn on her too.

    1. If you’re not sold on Kamala and you don’t think she’s ready, then why would you vote for her? If you don’t like either of them then just don’t vote.

  3. Democrats despise the existence of The United States of America as a separate, sovereign nation. Globalism means the end of individual nations and a world order ruled by, and for the benefit of, corporate and political elites who use the brainwashing powers of the media and the education system to control the mass of the world’s population. This is fact, not rant.

  4. Was JD Vance fast-tracked? Did he go through the primary process? Yet if something happens to Trump on Day 1, Vance becomes president.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply