Naked Opinion

Terrorist Attack: Just Another Night in Istanbul?

Istanbul attack
We are broken. We are furious. And we have every right to be, says Dogukan Günaydın recalling of the Istanbul attack.

We are broken. We are furious. And we have every right to be, says Dogukan Günaydın recalling of the Istanbul airport attack.

Istanbul was attacked. Its international airport, the third busiest in Europe, torn asunder by the pangs of extremism. I was shocked and terrified.

I was fiercely scrolling through Twitter — the one and only objective method in Turkey to learn what had happened. I knew something big must have happened, but could not know who, what, and why. The Turkish government’s censorship of this tragic event didn’t help either.

Even before guessing who had perpetrated these attacks this time, I tried contacting my family to know if they were safe. It was the fifteenth major terror incident in the last twelve months. No one can and should be used to senseless violence like this.

The details were quite abstract; there was too much conflicting information flow about the shootings and explosions. The footage,  too hard to handle for the same mind. Even the initial number of casualties were devastating. Dozens brutally murdered — how? Why? There were horrifying updates each second in the social media. I was hopelessly trying to reach out to anyone who could have possibly be there.

It was a matter of hours that the number of casualties estimated by the officials, who were seemingly unwilling to assume responsibility, was way off. Only a day after it was confirmed that at least 42 people were killed and over 200 were wounded. As the details of the attack emerged fully, everyone realized that this was not not only an attack, it was senseless slaughter.

People were brutally massacred in ostensibly the safest place in the country — beautiful Istanbul. Not even Istanbul is safe from madness. Social media trends like #prayforturkey are all but insufficient gestures to thwart terror attacks in cosmopolitan epicenters like the city I’ve known and loved.

Our compatriots’ reactions left little to be desired

Within minutes after the attack Borzou Daragah  reported that official taxi drivers of the Istanbul airport demanded $100 each to drive passengers away from the bomb scene. Obviously, drivers decided that such attack could lead a great economic profit . All that they had to do was to overcharge, exploiting stranded people in desperate need for help.

Comparing this situation to the Brussels attack this spring, when taxi drivers drove victims for free, things were a bit cruel in Istanbul. There were some moments of hope in the face of this nightmare. For example, officials were significantly more efficient than the Belgians in restoring clarity and order. After the night’s searing tragedy, our airport was fully functioning within hours, as if nothing had ever even happened. In fact, the long-awaited grand opening of the world’s fourth longest suspension bridge in Turkey was celebrated with joy and resolve only two days after the attack.

But the reaction to this horrifying chapter in modern Turkey reminds us all of the deep-seated problems our nation faces.

In an unsurprising manner to this Turkish citizen, not a single official resigned.

In the larger picture, this event has left me wondering what has happened to my once-democratic Turkey, now a de facto dictatorship with alleged links to terror affiliates.

Our state-influenced media stated that these attacks were perpetrated by terrorists to overshadow and overwhelm Turkey’s latest diplomatic achievements. The media went further to minimize my government’s shortcomings in preventing such tragedy. Its repercussions were also understated accordingly. According to our journalists, only tourism would suffer — and suffer for only a short time (just months!) at that.

Terrorists once again declared war on innocent citizenry across the world. They attacked the Turkish people. And to my deepest chagrin, in the face of the faith I still have in our people and politics, all our government was concerned with was optics, passing the buck, and savings face.

 

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

About the author

Dogukan Gunaydin

Dogukan Gunaydin

Doğukan Günaydın was born in Istanbul, Turkey. Since an early age he was exposed to a competitive education system where he was determined to succeed, leading him to complete his primary school as a valedictorian. Later on, he enrolled in Üsküdar American Academy which he left in sophomore year in the pursuit of more well-rounded education. He accepted a generous scholarship by United World College Maastricht. There, he completed the International Baccalaureate as well as became an active member of a diverse international community that strives for peace, understanding and a sustainable future. He developed a keen interest in economics and politics that encouraged him to take part in organizing the inaugural International Peace Conference which explores the theme of peace and the challenges of making peace a reality in the world we live in. During summer 2015, Doğukan attended the Politics, Philosophy and Economics session as part of the Yale Young Global Scholars program, with full scholarship. He recently graduated as a Davis-Mahindra Scholar, a recognition of his leadership and involvement in the community. Doğukan has decided to take a gap before continuing his education in university. Doğukan keeps himself informed of the economic progresses, enjoys cooking and is fond of both watching and playing basketball.

Library

Subscribe to the Newsletter